Recent Posts

Biculturalism and the Apollo-Soyuz Mission

The final two short audio pieces from the Monterey Summer Symposium on Russia. “A Brief Conversation on Biculturalism” by Alexandra Diouk and “Remembering the 1975 Apollo-Soyuz Mission: 45 years of US-Russian Space Cooperation” by Lisa Becker.

Trash Protests and Leninopad

Two short audio pieces from the Monterey Summer Symposium on Russia. “The Great Russian Trash Crisis” by Seth Farkas and  “An Empty Pedestal: Ukraine after Leninopad” by Sabrina Beaver.

Soviet Judgment at Nuremberg

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on reddit

The Allies organized the Nuremberg Trials to hold the Nazis accountable for their crimes and to restore a sense of justice to a world devastated by violence. But a major piece of the Nuremberg story has often left out: the Soviet Union’s pivotal role in making the trials happen in the first place.

Indeed, Soviet jurists developed the legal framework that treated aggressive war as an international crime, giving the trials a legal basis. The Soviets war effort and the costs they endured gave them moral authority. However, in the end, little went as the Soviets had planned and Stalin’s efforts to steer the trials from afar backfired. So, what was the Soviet contribution to Nuremberg Trials, and how did they win the war but lose the peace?


Francine Hirsch is Vilas Distinguished Achievement Professor of History at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She’s the author of Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of the Soviet Union. Her new book is Soviet Judgment at Nuremberg: A New History of the International Military Tribunal after World War II published by Oxford University Press.


Pete Seeger, “Last Train to Nuremberg.”